Unauthorized Commitments and Ratifications

An Unauthorized Commitment in federal acquisitions refers to an agreement or action by a government representative who lacks the authority to bind the government contractually. These actions are not legally binding on the government until properly reviewed and ratified.


Definition of Unauthorized Commitment

According to FAR 1.602-3:

  • An unauthorized commitment occurs when a government representative without proper authority obligates the government to pay for goods or services.
  • Examples include:
    • A government employee directing a contractor to perform work without a signed contract.
    • Overstepping delegated authority limits.
    • Acquisitions made by personnel not designated as contracting officers.

Consequences of Unauthorized Commitments

  • The government may not be legally bound to honor the commitment.
  • Could result in financial loss for the contractor and disciplinary action for the employee.
  • Reflects poorly on the agency’s adherence to procurement regulations.

Ratification of an Unauthorized Commitment

Ratification is the process by which an authorized official approves and legitimizes an unauthorized commitment, making it a valid government obligation.

Conditions for Ratification (FAR 1.602-3(c))

An unauthorized commitment can be ratified only if all the following conditions are met:

  1. Government Benefit: The government received a benefit from the goods or services provided.
  2. Contracting Officer Authority: The ratifying official has the authority to enter into a contractual agreement and to ratify the unauthorized act.
  3. Funding Availability: Adequate funds were available at the time the unauthorized commitment was made and remain available.
  4. Reasonable Action: The commitment would have been proper if made by an authorized contracting officer.
  5. Documentation: The person who made the unauthorized commitment provides a complete written statement detailing the circumstances.
  6. Fair Price: The price agreed upon must be determined fair and reasonable.

Process for Ratification

  1. Identify the Unauthorized Commitment:
    • Review the details of the commitment and assess whether ratification is appropriate.
  2. Request for Ratification:
    • The individual who made the unauthorized commitment must submit a written request explaining the situation, including:
      • The nature of the goods or services.
      • Why the unauthorized action occurred.
      • Any correspondence or agreements with the contractor.
  3. Review by Contracting Officer:
    • The contracting officer evaluates whether the conditions for ratification are met and determines if the price is fair and reasonable.
  4. Approval by an Authorized Official:
    • Ratification requires approval from an official with appropriate authority, typically the head of the contracting activity (HCA) or a designated representative.
  5. Completion:
    • Once approved, a formal contract or modification is issued to bind the government legally.

Prevention

  • Training: Ensure government personnel understand their roles and the limitations of their authority.
  • Clear Communication: Emphasize the importance of involving contracting officers in all procurement-related decisions.
  • Oversight: Implement checks to prevent unauthorized commitments.

By adhering to these steps and guidelines, agencies ensure compliance with federal acquisition regulations and maintain accountability in procurement practices.

Published
Categorized as Uncategorized